Agriculture FertilizerAgriculture Fertilizer
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Business
  • Insights
  • Crops & Livestock
  • Machinery
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • Trending
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Press Release

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest agriculture news and updates directly to your inbox.

What's On

Meet Envirotech’s 1,500-Pound Lift Ag Sprayer Drone

September 16, 2025

Culver’s Donates $100K Thanks to 100K ‘Green and Gold’ Streams

September 16, 2025

Protect Your Bottom Line While Dairy Production Rises

September 16, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Agriculture FertilizerAgriculture Fertilizer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Business
  • Insights
  • Crops & Livestock
  • Machinery
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • Trending
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Press Release
Agriculture FertilizerAgriculture Fertilizer
Home » Smithfield Fresh Meats Sued Over Pregnant Worker’s Firing

Smithfield Fresh Meats Sued Over Pregnant Worker’s Firing

August 21, 20252 Mins Read News
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp., which operates the world’s largest pork processing facility in Tar Heel, North Carolina, is facing a federal lawsuit that claims discriminating against a pregnant employee, according to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

The EEOC accuses Smithfield violated federal law by not providing a reasonable accommodation for pregnancy-related medical restrictions, by allegedly forcing the worker onto unpaid leave, and ultimately firing her.

According to the lawsuit, the employee notified Smithfield of her pregnancy shortly after being hired. Following a workplace accident, she developed complications that required medical treatment. Her doctor imposed restrictions, including a lifting limitation, which she reported to her employer. Instead of granting a reasonable accommodation, the EEOC lawsuit says Smithfield told her the company does not provide pregnancy-related accommodations. The employee was placed on unpaid leave and dismissed two weeks later.

The EEOC contends this conduct violates both the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, which requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for pregnancy and related conditions unless it causes undue hardship, and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits pregnancy discrimination.

This is a Smithfield facility in Virginia.

The suit, EEOC v. Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp., Case No. 7:25-cv-01410-M, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina after the agency attempted to resolve the matter through its conciliation process. The EEOC is seeking monetary compensation, including punitive and compensatory damages, as well as injunctive relief to prevent future violations.

“The PWFA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations to qualified employees with limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions unless it causes an undue hardship,” said Melinda C. Dugas, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Charlotte District. “Further, the law prohibits employers from forcing employees to take unpaid leave when other reasonable accommodations are available.”

The EEOC’s Charlotte District Office, which covers North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia, is leading the litigation. Smithfield Fresh Meats Corp. is part of Smithfield Foods, a Chinese-owned pork producer and food-processing company based in Smithfield, Virginia.

The EEOC is the sole federal agency responsible for investigating and litigating employment discrimination cases in the private sector.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Meet Envirotech’s 1,500-Pound Lift Ag Sprayer Drone

September 16, 2025 News

Protect Your Bottom Line While Dairy Production Rises

September 16, 2025 News

Farmers Rev Up for the Shell Rotella SuperTractors Competition

September 16, 2025 News

NCGA Honors 3 Winners of $300K Consider Corn Challenge V

September 16, 2025 News

Tyson Foods to Stop Using Corn Syrup in Products in U.S. by End of 2025

September 16, 2025 News

Asia Millers Buy More U.S. Wheat on Competitive Prices, Black Sea Delays

September 16, 2025 News

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss
Business

Culver’s Donates $100K Thanks to 100K ‘Green and Gold’ Streams

By staffSeptember 16, 20250

Earlier this year, Culver’s pledged to donate $1 for every rental and digital purchase of…

Protect Your Bottom Line While Dairy Production Rises

September 16, 2025

Farmers Rev Up for the Shell Rotella SuperTractors Competition

September 16, 2025

NCGA Honors 3 Winners of $300K Consider Corn Challenge V

September 16, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest agriculture news and updates directly to your inbox.

Our Picks

Tyson Foods to Stop Using Corn Syrup in Products in U.S. by End of 2025

September 16, 2025

Asia Millers Buy More U.S. Wheat on Competitive Prices, Black Sea Delays

September 16, 2025

3 Big Things Today, Sept. 15, 2025

September 16, 2025

Luke Bryan’s Farm Tour Builds on 10 Million Meals Donated to Rural America

September 16, 2025
Agriculture Fertilizer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 All rights reserved. Agriculture Fertilizer.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.