Agriculture FertilizerAgriculture Fertilizer
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Business
  • Insights
  • Crops & Livestock
  • Machinery
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • Trending
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Press Release

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest agriculture news and updates directly to your inbox.

What's On

Ross Chastain on Racing, Farming, and Staying Rooted

August 2, 2025

What’s Happening With Missouri Crops?

August 2, 2025

Pesticide Manufacturer Spent More Than $200K Lobbying in Iowa

August 2, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Agriculture FertilizerAgriculture Fertilizer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
SUBSCRIBE
  • Home
  • News
  • Management
  • Business
  • Insights
  • Crops & Livestock
  • Machinery
  • Technology
  • Weather
  • Trending
  • More
    • Web Stories
    • Press Release
Agriculture FertilizerAgriculture Fertilizer
Home » Benefits for Colorado, Blow to Department Workforce Foreseen in USDA Relocation

Benefits for Colorado, Blow to Department Workforce Foreseen in USDA Relocation

August 1, 20256 Mins Read News
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

By Delilah Brumer

The USDA’s plan to relocate thousands of Washington, D.C., employees to five regional hubs, including Fort Collins, Colorado, could be a boon for that state-based research while undercutting the department’s overall workforce, agricultural economists said.

The department wants to relocate up to 2,600 of its 4,600 D.C.-area employees to regional offices in Fort Collins, as well as Raleigh, North Carolina; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis; and Salt Lake City. The planned move would also phase out the USDA’s nine regional U.S. Forest Service offices, primarily into a single location in Fort Collins. 

Although the move will bring more experts and resources to Fort Collins, it will also mean turnover at the USDA, Colorado State University (CSU) agricultural economics professor Dawn Thilmany said. The department, which researches and regulates sectors such as farming, food safety, and natural resources, employs about 100,000 people. 

“I think there’s a lot to be said for the USDA being more locally organized, and it will benefit my grad students, having so much more of the talent affiliated with [the] USDA in our backyard,” Thilmany said. “But, regardless of how many people actually leave the department, because we don’t know what the number will be, it looks like it will be a significant disruption.”

The department is making the move “to bring [the] USDA closer to the people it serves while also providing a more affordable cost of living for USDA employees,” according to a statement from the department.

The statement said Fort Collins was chosen as a relocation hub “based on its existing USDA and Forest Service presence, proximity to agricultural communities and affordability relative to the Washington metro area — one of the most expensive in the country.”

Opportunities for Northern Colorado

Some Colorado lawmakers have expressed their approval of the planned move. Sen. John Hickenlooper, a Democrat, said in a post on X that “Fort Collins will be a great home for USDA’s new hub. Done correctly, this will harness Colorado’s agricultural communities’ expertise and help better connect USDA’s research to the folks on the ground.”

If a sizable chunk of the USDA workforce chooses to keep their jobs and relocate to Fort Collins, it would benefit Colorado through the department’s agricultural research, said Dana Hoag, a resource economics professor at CSU.

“Even when it’s national research, if you have a federal researcher in Colorado, it’s most likely going to be relevant to Colorado, and Colorado will probably benefit more than anybody else,” Hoag said.

The Colorado-based research the USDA conducts is often in partnership with CSU, meaning this move may yield more opportunities for CSU faculty and students, Hoag said.

Department Turnover Expected

The USDA statement did not specify a timeline for the employee relocation but said “some aspects of the reorganization will take place over the coming months, while others will take more time.”

Thilmany said USDA employees near retirement and those raising families in the Washington, D.C., area would be the least likely to relocate, based on the results of previous department relocation efforts. During the first Trump administration, the USDA pursued a narrower relocation directive, moving some employees to Kansas City, Missouri, which Thilmany said led to disruptive changes at the impacted agencies. 

Dana Hoag, resource economics professor at CSU

Ph.D. economists with the right skills aren’t just hanging on fruit trees, and when you have to hire a whole bunch of them, it could take a while.

— Dana Hoag, resource economics professor at CSU

She said there are two ways this new, broader directive could play out: It goes smoother this time because there are five cities instead of one; or it doesn’t and significant turnover results.

“Last time, there were a lot of delayed grants and programs and I was really concerned,” Thilmany said. “They definitely lost some people I thought were super-clever people, but they also hired really well. The problem again is, I am worried about if they’d be able to rebuild like that this time.”

If the department decides to bring in new hires to replace employees who choose not to relocate, it could pose challenges, Hoag said.

“Ph.D. economists with the right skills aren’t just hanging on fruit trees, and when you have to hire a whole bunch of them, it could take a while,” he added.

The union representing federal workers said the relocation plan is another harmful way to cut federal jobs. USDA Deputy Secretary Stephen Alexander Vaden said more than 90% of USDA workers are based outside the Washington, D.C., area, the Federal News Network reported.

Fort Collins’ Cost of Living

The USDA cited affordability as a reason for the relocation. Federal employees receive increased pay based on the cost of living in the city where they work, and Washington, D.C., has one of the highest pay bump rates, 33%.

Fort Collins has a slightly lower cost of living bump, 30%. This is comparatively high, relative to the other hub cities such as Salt Lake City and Raleigh, with 17% and 22% boosts, respectively.

Hoag pointed to Fort Collins’ rising cost of living and tough housing market as concerns about the USDA’s plan.

“I don’t see a lot of downsides, except for the personal lives that are going to be disrupted and the real estate market,” Hoag said.

Changes at the USDA

Pete Kolbenschlag, director of the Colorado Farm and Food Alliance, said the benefits of the employee relocation to Fort Collins should not distract from the harms of sweeping reorganization at the USDA.

Agencies within the department, including the U.S. Forest Service, have faced mass layoffs during President Donald Trump’s second term. Kolbenschlag said staff reductions are concerning, and so is the Trump administration’s rollback of several climate-friendly focuses at the USDA and other departments. 

“It’s important not to look at these things through just the framing of jobs in Colorado or more research being done out of our flagship ag school,” Kolbenschlag said. “Those are good things, but that’s a pretty narrow way of thinking when we’re talking about a massive reorganization of a major federal department that impacts everything from food security to renewable energy on rural lands to climate change and water policies.”

Colorado Newsline is part of the States Newsroom, a network of similar news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

Ross Chastain on Racing, Farming, and Staying Rooted

August 2, 2025 News

What’s Happening With Missouri Crops?

August 2, 2025 News

Pesticide Manufacturer Spent More Than $200K Lobbying in Iowa

August 2, 2025 News

Grains Close Lower Week-Over-Week | Friday, Aug. 1, 2025

August 2, 2025 News

Report Shows Biden-Era Funding Made ‘Significant Impact’ in Conservation Practice Adoption in Iowa

August 1, 2025 News

Trump’s America First Biodiesel Policy Could Cost U.S. Companies, Consumers, Trade Groups Warn

August 1, 2025 News

Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Don't Miss
News

What’s Happening With Missouri Crops?

By staffAugust 2, 20250

The USDA published the latest Crop Progress report on Monday, July 28. Here’s a closer…

Pesticide Manufacturer Spent More Than $200K Lobbying in Iowa

August 2, 2025

Grains Close Lower Week-Over-Week | Friday, Aug. 1, 2025

August 2, 2025

Report Shows Biden-Era Funding Made ‘Significant Impact’ in Conservation Practice Adoption in Iowa

August 1, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest agriculture news and updates directly to your inbox.

Our Picks

Trump’s America First Biodiesel Policy Could Cost U.S. Companies, Consumers, Trade Groups Warn

August 1, 2025

EPA’s public comment period opens on future of dicamba

August 1, 2025

Trump’s new round of global tariffs may cut Brazil by $1 billion

August 1, 2025

Study: Potato’s family tree has tomatoes in it

August 1, 2025
Agriculture Fertilizer
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
© 2025 All rights reserved. Agriculture Fertilizer.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.